《科学》 第392卷 第6800期 · 2026年5月21日 · 中文解读
生成式人工智能的使用与滥用呼吁高等教育评估改革
Generative AI use and misuse call for assessment reform in higher education · Igor Chirikov, Ivan Smirnov, René F. Kizilcec
约 24 分钟Policy Article在小程序里点播,20 到 60 分钟做好
这篇讲什么
一项针对美国95,513名学生的调查显示,生成式人工智能在不同学科和学生群体中的使用与滥用存在显著差异,这要求大学进行学科层面的评估改革。
原文开头
Growing misuse of, and unequal access to, AI tools requires universities to rethink how they evaluate learning Igor Chirikov1, Ivan Smirnov2,3, René F. Kizilcec4 The debate about the impact of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) on higher education is polarized. Some portray GenAI as normalizing cheating at scale (1), whereas others argue that misconduct patterns have changed little (2). These competing narratives underscore the need for reliable data on where GenAI use is concentrated and where misuse is most likely. Existing studies of GenAI adoption and perceptions in higher education provide useful early signals but often rely on small samples and lack measures designed to capture sensitive behaviors such as cheating across fields (3–5). …
摘自《科学》(Science)第392卷 第6800期 · 2026年5月21日,Igor Chirikov, Ivan Smirnov, René F. Kizilcec。仅引用开头一小段供了解文章,版权归原刊所有,全文请阅读原刊。

微信扫码,在小程序里听完整版
不用登录先听一篇 · 或在微信搜索小程序 晨间信号