《科学》 第391卷 第6791期 · 2026年3月19日 · 中文解读
自私的“微调”损害科学
Self-serving 'tweaks' hurt science · S. Venkataraman
约 8 分钟Books et al.在小程序里点播,20 到 60 分钟做好
这篇讲什么
社会科学家托马斯·普吕姆珀和埃里克·诺伊迈尔在《科学的信誉危机》一书中认为,科学家出于自私目的对研究模型进行的微调会破坏科学的可信度。
原文开头
“tweaks” hurt science Seemingly innocuous research decisions can harm scientific credibility, argue a pair of social scientists Shankar Venkataraman THE CREDIBILITY CRISIS IN SCIENCE | When a singer tweaks a musical arrangement to make a song sound better or a mechanic tweaks an engine to improve its performance, the word “tweak” denotes a small or innocuous change to a creative work or system to improve its output. In sharp contrast, the central argument in The Credibility Crisis in Science, by social scientists Thomas Plümper and Eric Neumayer, is that when scientists tweak their models for self-serving reasons, these changes are neither innocuous nor do they improve science. …
摘自《科学》(Science)第391卷 第6791期 · 2026年3月19日,S. Venkataraman。仅引用开头一小段供了解文章,版权归原刊所有,全文请阅读原刊。

微信扫码,在小程序里听完整版
不用登录先听一篇 · 或在微信搜索小程序 晨间信号