晨间信号Morning Signal
《科学》 第391卷 第6784期 · 2026年1月29日 · 中文解读

以回应错误作为诚信的衡量标准

Responding to error as a measure of integrity
约 11 分钟AAAS News & Notes在小程序里点播,20 到 60 分钟做好
这篇讲什么
本文讨论了科学期刊如何通过回应错误、促进数据共享和开放获取来维护科研诚信,并强调了作者参与和公众信任的重要性。
原文开头
At Science, we typically retract two to five papers a year. Although the number is relatively small, most retractions are discussed more widely. Unfortunately, the defensiveness of researchers, institutions, and journals is widely discussed, too. code. The results—highlighted in a Science Editor’s blog to kick off 2026—are encouraging. And yet, there’s more work to do. Science will take two new steps in 2026 related to improving data sharing, as outlined in the blog. Like many publishers, we’re also thinking about balancing open- ness of data with safety, where needed. A paper we published in October gave our editors an opportunity to work with authors to de- velop an innovative framework to manage an information hazard. …
摘自《科学》(Science)第391卷 第6784期 · 2026年1月29日。仅引用开头一小段供了解文章,版权归原刊所有,全文请阅读原刊。
晨间信号小程序码
微信扫码,在小程序里听完整版
不用登录先听一篇 · 或在微信搜索小程序 晨间信号
同期其他文章