晨间信号Morning Signal
《科学》 第392卷 第6801期 · 2026年5月28日 · 中文解读

澳大利亚同行评审制度的侵蚀

Australia’s erosion of peer review · Mark A. Dawson and Massimo A. Hilliard
约 7 分钟Editorial在小程序里点播,20 到 60 分钟做好
这篇讲什么
本文讨论了澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究委员会(NHMRC)在效率名义下逐步取消同行评审小组,导致科研资助评审质量下降,引发科学界担忧。
原文开头
Throughout the world, peer review serves as the cornerstone of the scientific enterprise, providing rigorous quality control and building the confidence that underpins progress for both science and society. Without such a robust process, scientists and the general public would rapidly lose the ability to distinguish groundbreaking advances from noise, which undermines policy decisions, research translation, and most importantly, public trust in science. Sadly, that is exactly what has been happening in Australia. Between 1992 and 2018, government support for fundamental research decreased by 17%, according to the Australian Academy of Science. Despite frustration in the gross underinvestment in biomedical research, Australian scientists were comforted by a trusted peer review system. …
摘自《科学》(Science)第392卷 第6801期 · 2026年5月28日,Mark A. Dawson and Massimo A. Hilliard。仅引用开头一小段供了解文章,版权归原刊所有,全文请阅读原刊。
晨间信号小程序码
微信扫码,在小程序里听完整版
不用登录先听一篇 · 或在微信搜索小程序 晨间信号
同期其他文章