晨间信号Morning Signal
《麻省理工科技评论》 第129卷 第2期 · 2026年3月刊 · 中文解读

气候法庭:极端天气受害者寻求法律新途径

Climate in the court · James Temple
约 7 分钟The Spark在小程序里点播,20 到 60 分钟做好
这篇讲什么
本文探讨了气候受害者如何通过新的法律途径和日益精确的科学归因,起诉化石燃料公司,并分析了近期法律裁决中有利于此类诉讼的迹象。
原文开头
So victims of extreme weather events continue to try new legal avenues and approaches, backed by ever-more-convincing science. Plaintiffs in the Philippines recently sued the oil giant Shell over its role in driving Super Typhoon Odette, a 2021 storm that killed more than 400 people and displaced nearly 800,000. The case relies partially on an attribution study that found climate change made extreme rainfall like that seen in Odette twice as likely. Overall, evidence of corporate culpability—linking a specific company’s fossil fuel to a specific disaster—is getting easier to find. For example, a study published in Nature in September was able to determine how much particular companies contributed to a series of 21st-century heat waves. …
摘自《麻省理工科技评论》(MIT Technology Review)第129卷 第2期 · 2026年3月刊,James Temple。仅引用开头一小段供了解文章,版权归原刊所有,全文请阅读原刊。
晨间信号小程序码
微信扫码,在小程序里听完整版
不用登录先听一篇 · 或在微信搜索小程序 晨间信号
同期其他文章