《科学》 第392卷 第6803期 · 2026年6月11日 · 中文解读
为科研项目资助模式辩护(有保留地)
In (qualified) defense of the research project grant · Pierre Azoulay
约 8 分钟Editorial在小程序里点播,20 到 60 分钟做好
这篇讲什么
本文讨论了美国科研项目资助模式的批评与改革提议,并为其结构性优点进行辩护。
原文开头
n a debate that has been building for years, a growing coalition of reformers has concluded that the research project grant (RPG) approach used by many science funders in the United States and based on competitive, investigator-initiated, and peer-reviewed proposals can- not support transformative science. Crystallizing this debate, the US National Science Foundation (NSF) has just committed $1.5 billion over the next decade to X-Labs, independent and milestone-driven research organizations meant to bypass not only the RPG but also the universities that have long been its principal recipients. Although the reform impulse may warrant sympathy, the X-Labs prescription merits skepticism. Criticisms of RPGs cluster around several legitimate themes. …
摘自《科学》(Science)第392卷 第6803期 · 2026年6月11日,Pierre Azoulay。仅引用开头一小段供了解文章,版权归原刊所有,全文请阅读原刊。

微信扫码,在小程序里听完整版
不用登录先听一篇 · 或在微信搜索小程序 晨间信号